<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>CTOvision - Latest Comments in Thin Client Laptops: Functionality, Security, Mobility</title><link>http://ctovision.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:35:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thin Client Laptops: Functionality, Security, Mobility</title><link>http://ctovision.com/2008/09/thin-client-laptops-functionality-security-mobility/#comment-21538733</link><description>Thanks all for the comments, I appreciate it.   I plan on continuing my evaluation.  But so far the biggest thing that needs to improve is the speed of cell networks.  And every indication is that all major providers will continue to invest heavily in increasing the speed of their services, so I think things will get better there relatively fast.  In fact, I think Verizon may outpace AT&amp;T; by the middle of 2009 (and I can't wait).&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Bob</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CTO Bob Gourley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:35:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thin Client Laptops: Functionality, Security, Mobility</title><link>http://ctovision.com/2008/09/thin-client-laptops-functionality-security-mobility/#comment-21538732</link><description>Since there is no local operating system, all "computationally complex processes" are handled on the server side, so can be as fast or complex as your budget can afford.&lt;br&gt;For ultra-complex graphics, the Sun Shared Visualization System can render graphics on an Nvidia Quadroplex graphics farm and deliver them to the Sun Ray at about 20 FPS, visually perceived as almost seamless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garry Robbins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:04:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thin Client Laptops: Functionality, Security, Mobility</title><link>http://ctovision.com/2008/09/thin-client-laptops-functionality-security-mobility/#comment-21538731</link><description>Bob - way cool.  Did you happen to test any (a) computationally complex apps/processes, or (b) high-end visualization apps with the laptop?  Wondering about the impact if any of sync &amp; latency, refresh rates, etc.&lt;br&gt;You're so right on the cost &amp; flexibility arguments.  For most users in most enterprises, this is a solid and defensible alternative.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lewis shepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:49:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thin Client Laptops: Functionality, Security, Mobility</title><link>http://ctovision.com/2008/09/thin-client-laptops-functionality-security-mobility/#comment-21538729</link><description>Thanks for the post, Bob. I like the potential of these devices and its nice to read a review of one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffrey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thin Client Laptops: Functionality, Security, Mobility</title><link>http://ctovision.com/2008/09/thin-client-laptops-functionality-security-mobility/#comment-21538728</link><description>The important thing for Federal security would be inclusion of a NIST validated FIPS 140-2 cryptographic module to protect its communications.  As it appears to support this through an optional Fortress Technologies module it might be of use in Federal systems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Philpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>